|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 30th, 2003
Location: GTA, ON
Posts: 3,830
|
I had a so called professional photographer aboard a Princess Cruise ship last month take our wedding pictures for us. It was all done digitally with a 5 meg Nikon Camera. I bought the CD negatives.
When I get home, I notice the pictures were only ~1.1 meg in size each. The resolution is 2000x1312. This is fine for printing at 4x6 or 8x10, but it is not printable for anything larger like 11x14. Is this acceptable (the resolution)? For them money I paid them, I would have thought they would be higher then this. Should I complain? |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links - Join the RedFlagDeals.com community and remove this ad. |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 20th, 2002
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 12,459
|
You may want to complain, but unless they explicitly stated something about the resolution of the images you were to receive, you probably have no legal right to even demand a refund.
That's a shame, though - you'd think a pro would know better.
__________________
Heatware 50 Positive, 0 Negative |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 18th, 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 11,408
|
Did you sign a contract/agreement with the pro? There might be a clause in there that clients don't get the highest res picture. Similar to a lot of pros don't give the films back to the clients if they shot films (some do, not all)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 27th, 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,397
|
that's a 2.6 mp picture. I'm surprised that they're using only a 5mp digital. Something like this should of been discussed before hand but they should give you higher res ones or print larger ones for you...but really if it's not in writting, there isn't too much you can do but complain.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 7th, 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,405
|
You should've worked it out beforehand. The camera probably wasn't set to maximum resolution to save space.
__________________
Gigabyte P35-DS3R Mobo | Antec P180 | Broken Laptop WTB: Blu-ray Movies MY HEATWARE |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 30th, 2003
Location: GTA, ON
Posts: 3,830
|
Thanks for the replies.. i guess you should never trust a professional photographer. Should have yelled at her when i noticed her changing CF cards every few miniutes because she was using 64 meg cards.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Deal Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 30th, 2003
Location: GTA, ON
Posts: 3,830
|
These are the settings for our pictures. Kind of hard to believe a professional photographer uses such low settings on their cameras. I could have got a friend to do a better job!
JPEG process Baseline Camera make NIKON CORPORATION Date/Time 2005:05:16 14:16:01 Flash used Yes Exposure time 0.008 s (1/125) JPEG Quality fine File size 1331614 bytes File date 2005:05:26 14:45:55 Resolution 2000 x 1312 Whitebalance cloudy Camera model NIKON D1X Focal length 18.0mm Metering Mode matrix Aperture f/5.6 72 dpi |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| Canadian Coupons Deals Features Freebies Forums Retailer Ratings Marketplace Credit Card Comparison Computer Price Comparison |

Join a community of over 200,000 bargain hunters from all across Canada. As a member you can post comments, ask questions, and share deals, coupons, and freebies! Best of all, signing up is free!