PDA

View Full Version : Ta-ke Sushi review (Downtown Toronto)


conbabes
Oct 31st, 2008, 11:26 AM
Has anyone tried Ta-Ke sushi here located on Front St & Bay? Any feedback is welcome since I wonder if my experience is unique?

Anyways, here is my personal experience with this restaurant.

After reading this review, http://www.dine.to/establishment_review_page.php?RecordID=179 and a few postings and comments in the Food & Drink forum, I decided to try out this restaurant since it recently opened. The impression I get from the review and postings is this is a higher end Japanese restaurant in terms of food and service, like Kaji but perhaps a lower grade.

Food: (6/10) I found most of the sashimi to be fresh but nothing spectacular, it actually tasted like a higher end AYCE restaurant in terms of quality. The Negi Toro was very good and tasted alot fresher than the other sashimi.
The spicy scallops handrolls were made very poorly since the rice seemed to be falling off the piece and were not tightly rolled. The scallops were good and fresh though.
The wasabi was not made fresh but from powder. In addition, it wasn't even spicy. Not sure if I'm being unreasonable here, but I've eaten uptown at some other restaurants like Cafe Michi and was given real wasabi.
Also, if this matters to anyone, you only get soup before you get your main dish. The soup was good, but nothing special since it tasted like regular miso soup from any Japanese restaurant.

Presentation: (5/10) The sashimi was arranged very pretty but I found that the fish was cut too thick, not sure if that is something reasonable to complain about, but it looked like they just cut thick chunks of fish and splatted it on the plate. In total there were about 8 types of sashimi.

Again the scallop rolls were falling apart but they did taste ok.

Alcohol menu: (8/10) Had about 10 choices for Sake etc, it seemed affordable and we ended up getting some warm sake :) There were other brands from Japan and the US.

Ambience: (3/10)It was nice but did not have a bamboo feel as shown on the website, the booths were all open and were not secluded from the rest of the eating area and were not real booths, you can see the people behind you since it was only small wooden bars separating the booths and can practically hear their conversations. For one couple sitting behind me(I was located in a "booth"), I felt like I can actually see the skin pores on his face and the detailing on his jacket, that's how close I felt I was sitting to them. The other tables in the main area seemed to be seated very close together since I noticed people were sitting literally 2 feet away from the next table.

Unlike the review, no hostess' were dressed in Kimonos, all were wearing a white shirt and black pants, so the review is misleading, they pretty much look like servers from other restaurants.

Service: (2/10)
You were given a hot towel at the very beginning to clean your hands and that felt like they were giving high end service. The towels were clean and smelled really good and it was a good way to start your dinner.

There were alot of servers but it was difficult in trying to flag them down all night since they were all standing near the kitchen. We had to ask 3 times from 3 different servers for more Green Tea. The Sake did come quickly though but the food took a very long time considering we were there earlier than 90% of the people in the restaurant. We waited for about 40 minutes++ before we got our main dishes. The 2 male greeters didn't greet us either and didn't make eye contact with us when we were going into the restaurant or leaving the restaurant.

The servers asked us if we wanted dessert but we were full since we had our main dishes and a few a la cartes, we declined and the server right away asked if we wanted to the bill. It felt like they were trying to kick us out despite the restaurant only being less than 1/2 full at 8pm.

Overall, if your expectations are thinking of this restaurant as a a Kaji, Hiro, or Zen, you will feel disappointed, since I find that this restaurant is not in the same class even though they claim to be and have Omakase . If you're thinking of this restaurant as a regular non AYCE japanese restaurant like Ninki restaurant(located at Scotiaplaza), then you won't be disappointed.

But if you're looking for higher end or more "authentic", Zen, Cafe Michi, Fune(downtown), Mochizuki(downtown)would be much better choices.

Papagorgio
Oct 31st, 2008, 11:54 AM
I partially agree with your comments. Yes, their wasabi is made from powder witch I find quite lame, becuase even takeout places like sushi 930 grade their own wasabi, however I did find it sufficiently spicy.

I found their sashimi to be very fresh, especially their bonito, not matched by any AYCE that i've been to (and i've been to them all!) and their rice was excellently seasoned and flavored.

I agree that their decor is not that attractive, as it seems like they tried to create an overal asian theme, it was not put togeather well..

I found the service to be excellent. Servers were not wearing Kimonos, but were very attentive and offered to refill my tea often. I didn't feel rushed at all.

Overall I think take is a great establishment, and I would not hesitate to return if I was in the area.. and I give them a 8.3/10 on my non-ayce sushi meter.. :P

CoffeeAddict
Oct 31st, 2008, 01:13 PM
I found some of the OPs comments strange because i've been 3 times, twice for dinner and once for lunch and have had good experiences all around. Service, quality of food, and presentation have also all been top-notch especially when i went for an Omakase dinner.

I think you might have either caught them on a bad day. It's either that or their service has gone downhill considerably in less than a year!

Also you suggest takesushi is new but it's been at that location for quite some time. It's been there at LEAST 10 years if not longer I think.

I also agree that Zen is far superior for sushi for roughly the same price. I think if zen were downtown though they would have to charge quite a bit more than takesushi. So when you think of it that way takesushi should be on a lower tier than Zen just based on pricing alone.

If Kaji were downtown I think their omakase would have to start at like $200 p/p!!!

EDIT: also i noticed you talked about the thickness of the sashimi. You do realize that not all fish are meant to be cut and presented the same way right? I also find at low-end sushi joints that the preparation and cutting of the sashimi is all wrong. It usually leads you to think it's the right way because you see it so much but as this site suggest there's different cuts for different fish

http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/5789/sashimi.htm

mitboi
Oct 31st, 2008, 01:36 PM
i enjoyed my visit last time i went.. which was 3 years back.
we sat at the sushi bar and asked the chefs what he recommended for the day and he just kept making us sushi by pieces...

conbabes
Oct 31st, 2008, 02:06 PM
Well to be honest, this is my personal experience last night and I wonder if I caught them on an off night or what, but overall, it was very disappointing since I considered this place on par with Zen or Kaji.

My wasabi was tasteless and I was surprised since I've never had wasabi so bland and non spicy.

I think they tried with present themselves as upscale in terms of service, but I had trouble flagging people down all night and felt cramped in their seats, just my personal experience.

I partially agree with your comments. Yes, their wasabi is made from powder witch I find quite lame, becuase even takeout places like sushi 930 grade their own wasabi, however I did find it sufficiently spicy.

I found their sashimi to be very fresh, especially their bonito, not matched by any AYCE that i've been to (and i've been to them all!) and their rice was excellently seasoned and flavored.

I agree that their decor is not that attractive, as it seems like they tried to create an overal asian theme, it was not put togeather well..

I found the service to be excellent. Servers were not wearing Kimonos, but were very attentive and offered to refill my tea often. I didn't feel rushed at all.

Overall I think take is a great establishment, and I would not hesitate to return if I was in the area.. and I give them a 8.3/10 on my non-ayce sushi meter.. :P

conbabes
Oct 31st, 2008, 02:13 PM
Well I guess I might have caught them on an off-day or they've gone downhill, that's why I wanted to see more responses and see if my experience was unique and it looks like so far its only been me having a bad night. :(

I was told either they changed management or Nami did, I might have got them mixed up.


I found some of the OPs comments strange because i've been 3 times, twice for dinner and once for lunch and have had good experiences all around. Service, quality of food, and presentation have also all been top-notch especially when i went for an Omakase dinner.

I think you might have either caught them on a bad day. It's either that or their service has gone downhill considerably in less than a year!

Also you suggest takesushi is new but it's been at that location for quite some time. It's been there at LEAST 10 years if not longer I think.

I also agree that Zen is far superior for sushi for roughly the same price. I think if zen were downtown though they would have to charge quite a bit more than takesushi. So when you think of it that way takesushi should be on a lower tier than Zen just based on pricing alone.

If Kaji were downtown I think their omakase would have to start at like $200 p/p!!!

EDIT: also i noticed you talked about the thickness of the sashimi. You do realize that not all fish are meant to be cut and presented the same way right? I also find at low-end sushi joints that the preparation and cutting of the sashimi is all wrong. It usually leads you to think it's the right way because you see it so much but as this site suggest there's different cuts for different fish

http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/5789/sashimi.htm

CoffeeAddict
Oct 31st, 2008, 02:15 PM
I'd probably skip takesushi next time and try Omi
Omi has reopened recently and you should definitely give chef John Lee the benefit of a doubt. The reviews have been all over the map for this place but if you go with an open mind and order the omakase (don't go for a la carte), then you should come out with a very good experience.

It's too bad you didn't have a good experience at takesushi but there's other sushi out there to try! Another poster mentioned 930 sushi on king west and i would recommend them as well. Talk to the chef there, tell him you'd like omakase sushi, give him a price limit and let him go to town. I had a $25 tax included limit and i was very very impressed with what I got. I would gladly do a $35 limit next time to give him a tiny bit more flexibility.

EDIT: DOH! i forgot to mention that 930 sushi is take out only... like Sushi Marche

CoffeeAddict
Oct 31st, 2008, 02:19 PM
according to chefdb it looks liek takesushi has been under the same ownership as Nami since 2001. On the topic of nami i would go there for the ambiance and for the service but i would say the food is not as good as the appearance would suggest. It's been eons since i've been though and it was early in my sushi eating days so my palate might have changed since then (we're talking like 10 years ago or so).

GoforTea
Nov 1st, 2008, 12:29 AM
But if you're looking for higher end or more "authentic", Zen, Cafe Michi, Fune(downtown), Mochizuki(downtown)would be much better choices.

Are you kidding ? Mochizuki has some of the worst sushi that I have ever tried in Toronto ! Cafe Michi's wasabi is fresh but it is not freshly grated, it is from pre-made fresh wasabi tube. I have eaten top grade wasabi in Japan and it is completely not the same, it is definitely not very spicy, a sweeter and refreshing taste and has a much mild after taste. I have been to Takesushi a few time and tried their sushi omakase, it's sushi is ok as Toronto standard, never considered as a top end sushi place but a decent one in Toronto core downtown.