eelfliw
Nov 24th, 2007, 08:06 PM
I recently installed a programmable thermostat in a house with natural gas fired boiler/radiator heating.
I noticed that the house takes more than an hour to heat up from 17 degrees to 20 degrees. And once the temperature is reached, even though the thermostat shuts off the furnace, the temperature keeps rising to 21+ degrees and takes about 2.5 hours before it starts to cool down. This appears similar to lake effect heating where land close to large bodies of water tend to stay warmer at nights.
Question is, if water takes longer than air to cool down (as it looses BTUs slowly), would it also take more BTUs to heat up? If that's the case, would it be more efficient to simply keep the house at a constant 18.5 degrees 24 hours a day (and using less natural gas to just keep the water warm) instead of changing the temperature from 17 degrees to 20 degrees twice a day where the gas burner runs at 100% for a couple of hours?
I noticed that the house takes more than an hour to heat up from 17 degrees to 20 degrees. And once the temperature is reached, even though the thermostat shuts off the furnace, the temperature keeps rising to 21+ degrees and takes about 2.5 hours before it starts to cool down. This appears similar to lake effect heating where land close to large bodies of water tend to stay warmer at nights.
Question is, if water takes longer than air to cool down (as it looses BTUs slowly), would it also take more BTUs to heat up? If that's the case, would it be more efficient to simply keep the house at a constant 18.5 degrees 24 hours a day (and using less natural gas to just keep the water warm) instead of changing the temperature from 17 degrees to 20 degrees twice a day where the gas burner runs at 100% for a couple of hours?