elty
Nov 21st, 2007, 01:11 AM
Essentially I am working on a salaried position. I am considering moving to a contract position (maybe renewable) position because it pays more and provides better experience for my future. I am also considering buying a new home. Financially I can afford it based on my current salary, and will give me lots of headroom if I move to the contract position.
The builder has two associated mortgage agents from RBC and TD, so naturally I talked to them. They both offer 18 months of cap rate thing. They said if I apply now they will confirm my current employment information and access me in that way. They said they will not access my employment information again during the time of closing which is about 1 year later. They suggest I should get an approval first, then I can start on the new contract position. If I apply after starting on the contract position, it will be tougher for me to get a mortgage since I only have 2.5 years of experience in the field (all of them salaried).
However I talked to my cousin who was a mortgage underwriter. She said the bank will reconfirm your employment information at the time of closing, and they can invalidate my approval if something changes. She said as a underwriter she will not like an applicant with only < 1 year of contract experience. It may not be the deal breaker but I should definitely be more cautious. On the plus side my girlfriend has a stable salaried job, and we will have 20% downpayment. She concluded with 2 years of NOA I may be able to get away with it.
I am just confused who is correct. Right now my job doesn't pay very well, so I have nothing to lose by moving to a contract position (which pays 25% more on top of better experience). The contract position ends 3 months before the closing, so even if I don't get renewal I will have three months to find a new job. I am not concerned I will be unemployed, I am concerned about the mortgage should I choose to remain in a contract position.
Also, are those mortgage broker lying?
The builder has two associated mortgage agents from RBC and TD, so naturally I talked to them. They both offer 18 months of cap rate thing. They said if I apply now they will confirm my current employment information and access me in that way. They said they will not access my employment information again during the time of closing which is about 1 year later. They suggest I should get an approval first, then I can start on the new contract position. If I apply after starting on the contract position, it will be tougher for me to get a mortgage since I only have 2.5 years of experience in the field (all of them salaried).
However I talked to my cousin who was a mortgage underwriter. She said the bank will reconfirm your employment information at the time of closing, and they can invalidate my approval if something changes. She said as a underwriter she will not like an applicant with only < 1 year of contract experience. It may not be the deal breaker but I should definitely be more cautious. On the plus side my girlfriend has a stable salaried job, and we will have 20% downpayment. She concluded with 2 years of NOA I may be able to get away with it.
I am just confused who is correct. Right now my job doesn't pay very well, so I have nothing to lose by moving to a contract position (which pays 25% more on top of better experience). The contract position ends 3 months before the closing, so even if I don't get renewal I will have three months to find a new job. I am not concerned I will be unemployed, I am concerned about the mortgage should I choose to remain in a contract position.
Also, are those mortgage broker lying?