PDA

View Full Version : if its brown, flush it down. If its yellow, let it mellow.


UrbanPoet
Oct 14th, 2007, 05:37 PM
I think if everyone in this world followed this rule we would all be in a better place.

D-Sisive
Oct 14th, 2007, 05:49 PM
but then you'll have to buy those chemical cleaners to clean the bowl where the yellow formed a line

so you're better off flushing either way

but sometimes its just clear if you drank alot of water and didnt have alot of sodium that day so let that sit...

beerbaron105
Oct 14th, 2007, 05:55 PM
the lengths people will go to, to save a bit of water :rolleyes:

my toilet gets flushed no matter what goes in there lol

bembol
Oct 14th, 2007, 05:59 PM
the lengths people will go to, to save a bit of water :rolleyes:

my toilet gets flushed no matter what goes in there lol

I save my piss in a 4L jug and flush in public washroom. :cheesygri

bionicbadger
Oct 14th, 2007, 08:27 PM
If you dont flush, you end up with a urine smell in your bathroom

tkyoshi
Oct 14th, 2007, 08:31 PM
Just get those new Low-Water usage toilets.

They also have 2 buttons, one for the yellow stuff which is 1/3 to 1/2 the amount of water used when you push the full flush.

Also it doesn't waste water filling up the bowl, it's shaped so things don't really stick despite it having much less water.

B0000rt
Oct 14th, 2007, 08:40 PM
My in laws have that tank. I took a poop in it once and tried the half flush, it worked! :D

Normal poop though, wouldn't ever try it with a big one....

tkyoshi
Oct 14th, 2007, 08:46 PM
My in laws have that tank. I took a poop in it once and tried the half flush, it worked! :D

Normal poop though, wouldn't ever try it with a big one....

Haha, be creative maybe try 1.5 flushes if it's a really big one ;) Just kidding, use the normal one if it's big.

joshmxpx
Oct 14th, 2007, 10:41 PM
but then you'll have to buy those chemical cleaners to clean the bowl where the yellow formed a line

so you're better off flushing either way

but sometimes its just clear if you drank alot of water and didnt have alot of sodium that day so let that sit...

If you dont flush, you end up with a urine smell in your bathroom

we've been following this motto for over 6 months, no yellow lines form, and no smell of urine in the bathroom. we'll probably keep doing it

legendofxix
Oct 14th, 2007, 10:47 PM
If your really concerned about saving water, there are a lot more ways you can save.
IE, taking a shower and plugging the tub, then using that used shower water to "flush" the toilet by transfering the water via bucket.
I'd say a lot more water is "wasted" when you take a 15-20 minute shower.
A huge amount when you take a bath.

CSK'sMom
Oct 14th, 2007, 11:09 PM
I can only assume that none of you have lived with a septic system and a water source other than "city" water. Many, many people live this motto. No chemical toilet cleaners are required, no yellow lines in the toilet and no urine smells either. Water is not an unlimited resource, contrary to popular belief. We got so used to living this motto while on the farm with a septic and well water that we still do it now that we're in the city.

ullyeus
Oct 14th, 2007, 11:29 PM
I concur with this,

UrbanPoet
Oct 15th, 2007, 12:22 AM
If your really concerned about saving water, there are a lot more ways you can save.
IE, taking a shower and plugging the tub, then using that used shower water to "flush" the toilet by transfering the water via bucket.
I'd say a lot more water is "wasted" when you take a 15-20 minute shower.
A huge amount when you take a bath.

nah... my showers only last 10 minutes max.
Only girls take that long to wash their hair etc....

although it seems gross, i been to isolated cottages where this rule has to be followed (or else you end up wasting valuable resources) and the bathroom never smelled.

brunes
Oct 15th, 2007, 10:16 AM
I always get a kick out of people who go to such an effort to save 4 gallons of water. What difference do you think it makes that you save 4 gallons of water once a day when you take a piss, when your municipality shoots TENS OF THOUSANDS of gallons of the stuff A DAY into the streets every spring via the hydrants to clear the sediment out of the system?

Repeat after me - Water is not a scarce resource. It is totally renewable. 70% of the planet is covered with the stuff. It is trivial to extract fresh water from seawater using nothing but the sun, people have been doing it for thousands of years. Lack of fresh water is a human issue, it is not a planetary issue like climate change.

The global water problem is nothing but a energy and distribution problem. Water conservation is important in areas where fresh water is expensive to procure, but not in Canada. Saving a minute amount of water daily by stinking up your bathroom does nothing to help the planet overall.

joshmxpx
Oct 15th, 2007, 10:22 AM
I can only assume that none of you have lived with a septic system and a water source other than "city" water. Many, many people live this motto. No chemical toilet cleaners are required, no yellow lines in the toilet and no urine smells either. Water is not an unlimited resource, contrary to popular belief. We got so used to living this motto while on the farm with a septic and well water that we still do it now that we're in the city.

I grew up on a well with septic tank, and every summer this was the rule, otherwise we would run out of water. Not a big sacrifice in my opinion, and I never can remember the bathroom stinking like urine.

Now when I was in college, that was another story! I haven't seen dirtier stinkier toilets than then, clogged and left to sit, yellow line, brown lines, you name it!

brunes
Oct 15th, 2007, 10:31 AM
Water is not an unlimited resource, contrary to popular belief
Actually, yes, it is. It is extremely difficult to take water and pollute it to an extent that it is is not cleansed by simple evaporation. To do such a thing the binding force between the H2O molecule and the polluting molecule woudl have to be great enough to overcome whatever their different sublimation points were, so that as gases they would not be miscible but continue to be bound together so that when the water condensates and falls as rain it would still retain the pollutant.

I don't know of ANY pollutants offhand that could do this. There are lots of airbourne pollutants that will mix with water and fall with rain (for example those that cause acid rain), but these compounds are a result of air pollution, not water pollution.

Bazooka Joe
Oct 15th, 2007, 10:32 AM
I'm curious about those that say they don't get a ring. Even leaving urine in the toilet for 10-15 minutes a day means I get a ring.

Here's how I know:

I get up in the morning, go to the bathroom and then take a shower. I used to let it sit during the shower so that the temperature in the shower didn't need to be changed after the toilet tank filled. I got rings in the toilet regularly. This being said, I don't clean my toilet all that often.

I switched it, I now go to the bathroom and flush, wait a few minutes (feed the dog) and then shower - no more ring.

How often do you guys who don't get a ring clean your toilets? And what do you clean them with? Do you use any 1000 flushes etc. type products?

hellodan
Oct 15th, 2007, 01:51 PM
zomg, i'm eating lunch and almost puked reading part of this thread >XD

joshmxpx
Oct 15th, 2007, 02:46 PM
I'm curious about those that say they don't get a ring. Even leaving urine in the toilet for 10-15 minutes a day means I get a ring.

Here's how I know:

I get up in the morning, go to the bathroom and then take a shower. I used to let it sit during the shower so that the temperature in the shower didn't need to be changed after the toilet tank filled. I got rings in the toilet regularly. This being said, I don't clean my toilet all that often.

I switched it, I now go to the bathroom and flush, wait a few minutes (feed the dog) and then shower - no more ring.

How often do you guys who don't get a ring clean your toilets? And what do you clean them with? Do you use any 1000 flushes etc. type products?

we flush out toilet maybe twice a day, once in the morning and once when we go to bed, unless someone does number two.

i have never had a problem with rings, unless some real nasty yellow urine is in there overnight.

i don't use any special cleaning/pucks products and i'll maybe swish the brush around the bowl once a week without using any product in it, toilet still looks brand new as far as we can tell.

every two weeks or three we'll actually clean it with some bowl cleaner and scrubbing, but its not like it needs it, still looks clean imo

eelfliw
Oct 15th, 2007, 03:28 PM
Where are the "organic food" people? Come on out and support this thread!!!

Organic food usually means no chemicals used in growing the food. That means no chemical pesticides and no chemical fertilizers. Years ago, when organic food first came out on the market, the fruits are puny and vegetables are half eaten by bugs. Some veggies even comes complete with little green worms (because they didn't wash the worms off).

Now, organic foods are better. Fruits are bigger and vegetable leaves stronger. Gone are the days when eating organic food means suffering.

How is this related to less flushing? Well, years ago I was invited to a friend's house for dinner and they grow their own vegetables in the backyard. It's fall harvest season and they invited friends over to share the harvest. The veggies are VERY TASTY!!! Nothing compares to tomatoes & spinach & carrots plucked from the ground just hours before eating.

After dinner, the host reveals the secret to their awesome vegetable garden. The flush toilets in their home is only for guests. They don't use flush toilets. So there are no rings, no smell and they don't even clean their toilets unless they have guests. They do their thing in a bucket in the backyard shed. They collect this all year round and use it to fertilize the vegetable garden. That's why the food tastes so good. And yes, we've been eating the product of their excrements and enjoying it.

So, the next time you buy organic food, just remember that you're eating someone else's sh1t and paying top dollars for that sh1t. And yes, you are also helping to save water in the toilet.

astroboi
Oct 15th, 2007, 04:05 PM
How about getting a urinal for every household? Or using the sink? :cheesygri

MegaSilver
Oct 15th, 2007, 05:49 PM
"We got a little rule back home: if it's brown, drink it down; if it's black, send it back." ~ Homer J. Simpson

Keelie
Oct 15th, 2007, 06:16 PM
i have to agree with those who say it leaves a ring in the toilet if you dont flush.
hubby was in the habit of not flushing for a while, and the toilet was always dirty! yuck, no thanks, i'll flush.

besides, sometimes the cats drink out of there. i like to leave the lid up because the little one plays so much that she spills the water dish... if i'm not around i want them to be able to have access to water at all times.

Diskdoctor
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:13 PM
Actually, yes, it is. It is extremely difficult to take water and pollute it to an extent that it is is not cleansed by simple evaporation. To do such a thing the binding force between the H2O molecule and the polluting molecule woudl have to be great enough to overcome whatever their different sublimation points were, so that as gases they would not be miscible but continue to be bound together so that when the water condensates and falls as rain it would still retain the pollutant.

I don't know of ANY pollutants offhand that could do this. There are lots of airbourne pollutants that will mix with water and fall with rain (for example those that cause acid rain), but these compounds are a result of air pollution, not water pollution.

Yes it's possible to purify water but the method you're suggesting - evaporation takes vast amounts of energy. (2230 kiloJoules to evaporate a kg of water at 100 degrees C plus 4.2kJ for each degree celsius you have to raise the temp to get it to 100 degrees)

A liter of gasoline can give you about 34600 kJ of energy so to purify the 326 litres of water that the average Canadian uses per day using this method would require the equivalent of nearly 24 litres of gasoline!

Now I suppose one could set up a system whereby some of this energy was recovered but evaporation is an impractical method for purifying water on a large scale. Only in the Middle East where water is scarce and energy cheaply available do they use this method to extract fresh water from the ocean and you can bet they're more careful with their water use than we are.

In any case I'm not sure why I bother to address this because evaporation is not the method used by water treatment plants in Canada. It takes energy to clean water, transport it to your house, and then to clean it up after you've dirtied it up. So at the very least by cutting back on water use you're cutting back on energy use. Energy is certainly something we don't have an unlimited supply of.

Spidey
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:18 PM
I can only assume that none of you have lived with a septic system and a water source other than "city" water. Many, many people live this motto. No chemical toilet cleaners are required, no yellow lines in the toilet and no urine smells either. Water is not an unlimited resource, contrary to popular belief. We got so used to living this motto while on the farm with a septic and well water that we still do it now that we're in the city.

We just moved this weekend, and we now have septic and a cistern. So I'm defintly following it more. Even in the city I did, so it wont be too hard to do.

The idea of running out of water is a worry to me. I'm thinking of buying a water tank and utility trailer so I can haul it myself instead of having to rely on a water hauling company. That way I know Im getting my moneys worth

We upgraded our old washer and dryer to the new front loads that use less water as well, and have been considering upgrading the toilets to those new dual systems, when we finally get settled.

Do you know the average cost of these. This new place has for bathrooms. Although Im telling my boys if you have to go number 1 and your outside, just use the closest tree ;-)

Diskdoctor
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:21 PM
Our whole flush toilet system is bizarre when you think about it. The cycle goes like this:

1) take water from a lake or some aquifer
2) filter it and add chemicals to purify it so it's drinkable
3) pump it to your house
4) urinate/defecate in it
5) filter out the urine/feces
6) do some more purificaiton
7) send water back to the lake
8) repeat

Why composting toilets aren't widely available I don't know.

Spidey
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:23 PM
I always get a kick out of people who go to such an effort to save 4 gallons of water. What difference do you think it makes that you save 4 gallons of water once a day when you take a piss, when your municipality shoots TENS OF THOUSANDS of gallons of the stuff A DAY into the streets every spring via the hydrants to clear the sediment out of the system?

Repeat after me - Water is not a scarce resource. It is totally renewable. 70% of the planet is covered with the stuff. It is trivial to extract fresh water from seawater using nothing but the sun, people have been doing it for thousands of years. Lack of fresh water is a human issue, it is not a planetary issue like climate change.

The global water problem is nothing but a energy and distribution problem. Water conservation is important in areas where fresh water is expensive to procure, but not in Canada. Saving a minute amount of water daily by stinking up your bathroom does nothing to help the planet overall.


because if you have a cistern that only holds 2500 gallons, you have to fill it up more often.

Eldorado
Oct 17th, 2007, 05:10 PM
Pee in the shower..

st7860
Oct 17th, 2007, 05:49 PM
Pee in the shower..

http://media.www.dailycollegian.com/media/storage/paper874/news/2001/05/01/News/Looks.Like.Most.Of.Us.Pee.In.The.Shower-1548616.shtml

brunes
Oct 17th, 2007, 05:57 PM
because if you have a cistern that only holds 2500 gallons, you have to fill it up more often.

Yeah but what you're talking about here is a practical problem. Has nothing to do with the environment.

Ojam
Oct 17th, 2007, 09:58 PM
Pee in the shower..

I do, I aim right for the drain though, most of the time I hit it in one try, sometimes a miss by a few cm.

romsan04
Oct 17th, 2007, 10:02 PM
Pee in the shower..

i just did LOL :cheesygri :D

brunes
Oct 18th, 2007, 06:59 AM
i just did LOL :cheesygri :D

If you're in the shower by yourself, why not? Its sterile, you're already bathing, and our shower drain and toilet drain go to the same place.

If it's a community shower though like in the above article, its just bad manners, even if it doesn't actually harm anyone. Passing gas in a crowded room isn't harming anyone either but that doesn't mean it shouldn't try to be avoided.

joshmxpx
Oct 18th, 2007, 09:15 AM
If you're in the shower by yourself, why not? Its sterile, you're already bathing, and our shower drain and toilet drain go to the same place.

If it's a community shower though like in the above article, its just bad manners, even if it doesn't actually harm anyone. Passing gas in a crowded room isn't harming anyone either but that doesn't mean it shouldn't try to be avoided.

Does this remind anyone of Seinfeld: "They're pipes! They're all connected!" :lol:

Regarding passing gas in a crowded room, that's a better place than any because there's less chance to get caught :twisted:

othermike
Oct 18th, 2007, 03:55 PM
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070924.wlakes24/BNStory/National/home

The Great Lakes contain about one-fifth of all the fresh water on the planet. Although a drop of a metre may not seem like much compared to what they contain, about 99 per cent of the lake water is considered a legacy of the last ice age and is basically non-renewable.

Only about 1 per cent is replenished each year through precipitation, and has to offset what flows out of the lakes through the St. Lawrence River into the Atlantic Ocean.


Actually, yes, it is. It is extremely difficult to take water and pollute it to an extent that it is is not cleansed by simple evaporation. To do such a thing the binding force between the H2O molecule and the polluting molecule woudl have to be great enough to overcome whatever their different sublimation points were, so that as gases they would not be miscible but continue to be bound together so that when the water condensates and falls as rain it would still retain the pollutant.

I don't know of ANY pollutants offhand that could do this. There are lots of airbourne pollutants that will mix with water and fall with rain (for example those that cause acid rain), but these compounds are a result of air pollution, not water pollution.

Madchester
Oct 18th, 2007, 04:40 PM
eww... this thread reminds me of that ratemypoo.com website. Like the hot or not photo rating site... except that one rates something else.

st7860
Oct 18th, 2007, 05:48 PM
eww... this thread reminds me of that ratemypoo.com website. Like the hot or not photo rating site... except that one rates something else.

poopreport is better.