antichrist born??

[stronghold]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17188458&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=born-at-6am-on-06-06-06--his-mum-was-induced-for-6-days--he-weighs-6lbs-6oz-and-he-s-called---d-name_page.html

dunno how to do url tags so i just pasted the link ...
coincidence??

[UrbanPoet]

then we shall fight a holy war against EVIL!
whos in?

[Crotchety Old Man]

Anyone who has witnessed poedua's debating style cannot deny the truth of this thread's subject. - something wicked this way comes.

[UrbanPoet]

Anyone who has witnessed poedua's debating style cannot deny the truth of this thread's subject. - something wicked this way comes.

Poedue debates like a robot.
it just kinda spews out info In perfect sentences sometimes i think hes a bot.

[Firebot]

Too bad the number 666 isn't actually the beast's number, so the whole fad is a sham.

[dark169]

Too bad the number 666 isn't actually the beast's number, so the whole fad is a sham.

not to mention the calander has been adjusted a few times over they years. :lol:

[Rogue_77]

then we shall fight a holy war against EVIL!
whos in?
Count me in but I'll be on the other side :twisted:

[mocha_keisha]

Count me in but I'll be on the other side :twisted:


I want to slay some demons like in Doom 1 and 2!!!! Give me a shotty, I love that weapon!

[mattpiloto]

Too bad the number 666 isn't actually the beast's number, so the whole fad is a sham.

But the EVIL...

http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/gallery/misc/pixel_homer3.gif

[Rogue_77]

I want to slay some demons like in Doom 1 and 2!!!! Give me a shotty, I love that weapon!

Wasn't there a chainsaw in there too? Or am I thinking of another game?

[mocha_keisha]

Wasn't there a chainsaw in there too? Or am I thinking of another game?


yeah their was a chainsaw too. Wasn't too effective when there were multiple monsters smashing fireballs at you though lol. It usually worked for the pink pig looking demon that bites you, and the imp and zombies. Though it was tough to manuaver.

[fakishan]

Poedue debates like a robot.
it just kinda spews out info In perfect sentences sometimes i think hes a bot.
haha, I was thinking the exact thing last night reading the forums. I was thinking of refering to him as a wiki-bot.

[mocha_keisha]

haha, I was thinking the exact thing last night reading the forums. I was thinking of refering to him as a wiki-bot.


LOL, entering the ring at 165 pounds...... Poedue "The Wiki-bot" Foremannnnn!

and in the other corner.... ladies and gentlemen we haveeee.... weighing at 170 poundssssss; B40 "Man-Thong" Frazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzieeeeerrr!

Lets get readddddy to rumbleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

[x86asm]

LOL, entering the ring at 165 pounds...... Poedua "The Wiki-bot" Foremannnnn!

and in the other corner.... ladies and gentlemen we haveeee.... weighing at 170 poundssssss; B40 "Man-Thong" Frazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzieeeeerrr!

Lets get readddddy to rumbleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Guys at least spell the name correctly!

[NG]

Anti-Christ born?

Too late...

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40325000/jpg/_40325581_harper_b203_ap.jpg

(j/k - we all know that's VP Dick C ;) )

[BadDrafter]

then we shall fight a holy war against EVIL!
whos in?

Naturally I will fight against goodness on the side of evil.

[Aero]

666 is the number of the beast. Not its birth date.

Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell who does not have the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom: let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number. Its number is six threescore six

Unless they barcode us with our birthdate in our right hand or forehead. :cheesygri

[Gordon]

Yeah Yeah Yeah 666 bull crap. Omen my ass.
666 in chinese is luck! WOOHOOO!
YEAH YEAH! THAT IS ONE LUCKY BABY!

Man thats pretty weird. I wonder if thats a fake article?

[Gordon]

666 is the number of the beast. Not its birth date.

Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell who does not have the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom: let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number. Its number is six threescore six

Unless they barcode us with our birthdate in our right hand or forehead. :cheesygri

Yeah my barcode would say.

||||||||
#47.

[Txiasaeia]

Anyone who has witnessed poedua's debating style cannot deny the truth of this thread's subject. - something wicked this way comes.

Let's see... how many times have you been banned for similar comments? I'm starting to lose track.

[gordholio]

A date of birth doesn't have anything to do with being an Anti-Christ.
When the anti-Christ comes to power, most people will not know he really is who he is.
Most people will think he's a genius and that he brings peace and will follow him unfortunately.

[xKagex]

666 is the number of the beast. Not its birth date.

Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell who does not have the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom: let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number. Its number is six threescore six

Unless they barcode us with our birthdate in our right hand or forehead. :cheesygri

Not that I buy any of this apocalyptic end of the world stuff, but I'd be more worried about RFID tags than barcodes. They're already talking about implanting them into immigrants.

[Jump]

I think the front page of the Sun today had a picture of him...

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/7307/torsuncoverlarge5mg.gif

[gordholio]

I think the front page of the Sun today had a picture of him...

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/7307/torsuncoverlarge5mg.gif

Jesus did not have long hair.

[x86asm]

I think the front page of the Sun today had a picture of him...

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/7307/torsuncoverlarge5mg.gif
LOL

[x86asm]

Jesus did not have long hair.

I don't know, it's hard to believe that given the many depictions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

[gordholio]

Not that I buy any of this apocalyptic end of the world stuff, but I'd be more worried about RFID tags than barcodes. They're already talking about implanting them into immigrants.

Those microchip RFID (VeriChip) are now being offered to hospitals in the United States who want to implant them in their patients. There are some hospitals in the US doing this at the present moment.
It is being introduced for "apparently" useful purposes right now, but as time goes it will become less voluntary (and turn much more sinister) and used on a wider variety of groups - mental patients, children, prisoners, etc.
Some are even talking about implanting babies with chips after they are born.

[poedua]

Guys at least spell the name correctly!

I agree....if they're going to take shots at me...at least get the name right :)

[mocha_keisha]

I agree....if they're going to take shots at me...at least get the name right :)


I personally was just playing around. I don't have any ill feelings towards you
Poedua ;)

[gordholio]

I don't know, it's hard to believe that given the many depictions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus



Did Jesus Have Long Hair?

http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/JC/humanbeing_longhair.htm

Most people assume that Jesus had long hair. After all, that's the way they've always seen Him portrayed in every painting, drawing or movie. That's the only Jesus they've ever seen. But are those depictions accurate?

The fact is, we don't know what Jesus looked like, because the first depictions of Him weren't done until hundreds of years later. Thus every image we've ever seen of Him is based on nothing but the artists' imaginations.

While we don't know what Jesus looked like, we do know that He didn't look like the common depictions of Him with long hair. After all, this same Jesus inspired the apostle Paul to write in 1 Corinthians 11:14: "Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him?"

In addition to this instruction regarding long hair on men, the Bible also contains circumstantial evidence that Jesus didn't have long hair.

Perhaps the most telling is that when Judas betrayed Jesus, he had to identify Jesus by a kiss. That was the prearranged signal Judas had given so that the guards could identify Jesus. Why did Judas have to do that? Because Jesus looked just like any average man of His day, and they wouldn't have been able to identify Him if Judas hadn't betrayed Him with a kiss.

This incident shows us that Jesus looked like any ordinary, average Jew of His day; there was nothing distinguishing about Him. The messianic prophecy of Isaiah 53:2 (NIV) says of Him: "He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him."

The Gospels tell us that on at least two occasions Jesus slipped away into the crowds when people were trying to kill Him (Luke 4:30; John 8:59). He was able to escape harm because He was simply an average-looking man of His day and blended in with the other people around Him.

A Feb. 24, 2004, Associated Press article reports: "'Jesus didn't have long hair,' said physical anthropologist Joe Zias, who has studied hundreds of skeletons found in archaeological digs in Jerusalem. 'Jewish men back in antiquity did not have long hair.' 'The Jewish texts ridiculed long hair as something Roman or Greek,' said New York University's Lawrence Schiffman" ("Jesus Scholars Find Fault in Gibson's 'Passion'"). However, it wasn't at all typical among even the Greeks and Romans, as plenty of statues and coins from the time attest.

"Along with extensive writings from the period, experts also point to a frieze on Rome's Arch of Titus, erected after Jerusalem was captured in AD 70 to celebrate the victory, which shows Jewish men with short hair taken into captivity" (ibid.).

Jesus wasn't the tender, effeminate man with a somewhat angelic appearance as commonly depicted in paintings. He was a carpenter, a builder, a man who knew the construction trade. He knew how to cut down trees and make wooden beams, to haul rocks to build walls, to construct buildings from stone and timber.

The Gospels make it clear that He spent a lot of time outdoors. He hung out with fishermen, the kind of characters who would never respect and look up to a weakling. Yet Jesus had 12 disciples who followed Him everywhere He went and who in time died for Him. They knew Him as a real man, not the fabrication we see in so many paintings.
__________________________________________________ ___

http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/jesuslonghair.htm

"Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?" I Corinthians 11:14

Jesus was not a Nazarite! According to Numbers 6:1-27, a Nazarite did wear long hair. However, Jesus was a Nazarene and not a Nazarite. While the two words look similar in English, they are entirely different in looks and meaning in the original language of the Bible. A Nazarene was one that lived in Nazareth, according to Matthew 2:23. A Nazarite was one who took a Nazarite vow, according to Numbers 6.

The Nazarite vow was usually temporary. (Samson and Samuel seem to be notable exceptions, for their vow was for life. See I Samuel 1:11 and Judges 13:5; 16:17).

The Nazarite vow was a vow of separation. Three things were forbidden as long as he was under the vow. (1) "He shall separate himself from wine and strong drink, and shall drink no vinegar of wine, or vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes, nor eat moist grapes, or dried." Num. 6:3. (2) He could not cut his hair. (3) He could not touch or come near a dead body. Num. 6:6-9.

A Nazarite could not have used any product of the vine, and thus Jesus could not have instituted the Lord's supper if he had been a Nazarite. For in this, he used the fruit of the vine.

If He had been a Nazarite, He could not have touched the funeral "bier" (open coffin) of the dead man in Luke 7:11-18.

If He had been a Nazarite, it is doubtful that the Holy Spirit would have caused Paul to write, "if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him." I Cor. 11:14.

If He had been a Nazarite, Judas would not have needed to identify Him in Gethsemane, since Jesus would have been the only long haired man there. Everything in the New Testament seems to indicate that Jesus looked much like the other Jewish men of His age. If there had been any radical difference in His appearance, we believe that it would have been mentioned in the Bible.

[poedua]

Let's see... how many times have you been banned for similar comments? I'm starting to lose track.

Crotchety Old Man has been banned ? More than once ?

Why would the mods go and ban a nice guy like Crotchety Old Man ?

[poedua]

I personally was just playing around. I don't have any ill feelings towards you
Poedua ;)

No problem :)

[poedua]

I don't know, it's hard to believe that given the many depictions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

Not up on what constitutes blasphemy in Islam ( i.e the cartoon outrage ) , but - unlike Christ - anyone know if there is a consensus depiction of Mohammad the Prophet...or is it even allowed. ?