View Full Version : User age category
162
Feb 15th, 2006, 03:50 PM
While I am not condemning the use of the site by teenagers or young adults I would like to suggest a signatory type of identification as to the age or generation of who posts material on this website. Something similiar to the current newbie/jr member/sr member/etc. etc. I know its impossible to enforce but even perhaps a voluntary method would be better than none at all. I see a lot of crap posted that isn't logical nor mature material and knowing where its coming from would answer a lot of assumptions on my part.
K10
Feb 15th, 2006, 04:00 PM
voluntary method: birthday
NDman
Feb 15th, 2006, 04:04 PM
What's there to stop people from posting fake age?
Becks
Mar 2nd, 2006, 08:53 PM
Some older folks are immature, some younguns are more mature than their peers. By referring to the age of an RFDer, you are more prone to pre-judge them and/or make more assumptions about their character/lifestyle/intellect/values etc when in reality you know practically nothing about them other than their RFD online persona. Same goes with knowing an RFDer's weight, race, income level, etc. Knowing these things all play into stereotypes we have in our heads. Must we always try to fill in the blanks about people? When we fill in the blanks by extrapolating on few facts, it's no wonder why we are surprised that person X wasn't the person we thought s/he was, or that they were/weren't capable of doing a particular thing.
B40
Mar 2nd, 2006, 09:54 PM
What's there to stop people from posting fake age?
Exactly.
This idea is pointless.
Agent_J
Mar 2nd, 2006, 11:42 PM
well instead of age, perhaps we could all fill out a brief survey which would analyze and rate our maturity levels?
FastFokker
Mar 3rd, 2006, 06:52 AM
well instead of age, perhaps we could all fill out a brief survey which would analyze and rate our maturity levels?Even better, let's give everyone IQ tests.
angy
Mar 3rd, 2006, 09:33 AM
it all comes with running a forum =)
CodecX81
Mar 6th, 2006, 02:19 PM
I'm 24 goin on 15.
john widow
Mar 13th, 2006, 05:02 AM
Some older folks are immature, some younguns are more mature than their peers. By referring to the age of an RFDer, you are more prone to pre-judge them and/or make more assumptions about their character/lifestyle/intellect/values etc when in reality you know practically nothing about them other than their RFD online persona. Same goes with knowing an RFDer's weight, race, income level, etc. Knowing these things all play into stereotypes we have in our heads. Must we always try to fill in the blanks about people? When we fill in the blanks by extrapolating on few facts, it's no wonder why we are surprised that person X wasn't the person we thought s/he was, or that they were/weren't capable of doing a particular thing.
your insane............
Edit: "You're insane.
rubberband
Mar 15th, 2006, 01:05 PM
What's the point, really? I don't know about you, but I've met a number of teens mature way beyond their years, and an equal if not greater number of fellow adults with the maturity of a ******** puppy. It's all relative..
You'd be amazed at the age of some of teh usr how typ lk ths d00d!
alpha_tot
Mar 19th, 2006, 10:55 PM
Even better, let's give everyone IQ tests.
QFT
john widow
Mar 20th, 2006, 05:23 AM
Don't IQ tests only test how much data your brain can determine in a certain amount of time or something? Like anyone can know anything......maybe some people might be a lot slower.
FastFokker
Mar 20th, 2006, 07:14 AM
Don't IQ tests only test how much data your brain can determine in a certain amount of time or something? Like anyone can know anything......maybe some people might be a lot slower.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_test
But just to clarify, I was joking.. :lol: Even extremely bright and extremely old people can be immature, it's not exclusive to a certain age category.