PDA

View Full Version : Stupid pothole #@%!


tkl
Feb 5th, 2005, 11:30 PM
My car ran over a pothole during one of those -30C days about a week ago and I just got the photos back. That hole was a canyon ! It completely blew out the sidewall of the one front tire and I had to change the spare tire myself since any tow truck via my Candiantire auto club was a 2 hour wait due to the weather.

Total out of pocket cost with taxes was about $ 75.00. Full price would have been about $ 110 bucks but Motomaster tires have a pro-rated guarantee which was the only pleasant surprise. The <a href=../autolink/redirectpage.php?linkid=24 target=_blank>Canadian tire</a> auto club would have done the repair for free (go to know for future reference) but the sidewall was not repairable. Kudos to the poster for the <a href=../autolink/redirectpage.php?linkid=24 target=_blank>Canadian Tire</a> autoclub deal about a month ago.

After all that, can anybody advise how can I submit the claim for damages or sue the City of Toronto for the cost incurred ? Or even bother for that matter.

chickenbones
Feb 5th, 2005, 11:38 PM
I think I have read this some where else before (could be here). I don't think you can really sue the city for damages, unless you can prove that your damage was a direct result of the city's negligence. I don't know how easy that is.

tip
Feb 6th, 2005, 12:50 AM
If you want to sue anyone, sue the province. Not only is the TTC severely underfunded, so is the roads department. This is a direct result of provincial policy. If you wonder why the roads are in such crappy shape, look to Queen's Park.

Kevin T
Feb 6th, 2005, 12:57 AM
Yet how did we raise many millions to help the Tsunami relief?

bug
Feb 6th, 2005, 02:13 AM
You may not complain about potholes, unless you lived in Montreal.

Pothole capital of the world!
Well technically the whole province. :cry:

dischick
Feb 6th, 2005, 02:42 AM
I suggest checking your provincial/municipal laws. In Alberta, you're under a strict time limitation to sue and you must notify the municipality AND there are limitations of WHAT you can sue them for.

ainsane
Feb 6th, 2005, 03:01 AM
My parents hit a manhole cover before that wasnt in place properly on the 401 and ruined a few of the tires and rims. The city paid for it with a bit of nagging but at least they didn't have to sue.

chickenbones
Feb 6th, 2005, 03:08 AM
My parents hit a manhole cover before that wasnt in place properly on the 401 and ruined a few of the tires and rims. The city paid for it with a bit of nagging but at least they didn't have to sue.


An object that is the responsibility of the city on the highway is another story, I assume it'll be so much harder to sue over a pothole since it is a "natural" occurance.

But it does suck about what happened.

Gee
Feb 6th, 2005, 06:28 AM
Worse case scenario is that the city will say that you were not paying attention to the road and ran over the pot hole.

Avoidance first and foremost

Singh_21
Feb 6th, 2005, 10:29 AM
Having visited India just last month, this thread seems kindaa funny to me.

Shiifty
Feb 6th, 2005, 11:01 AM
I know of someone who was reimbursed by the city for tire damage after hitting a major pothole. They didn't have to sue, but had to submit a receipt and photos of the damage and pothole. This was in the GTA and over 10 years ago, YMMV.